From the Complete Exposome to an Actionable Exposure Profile in Occupational Health

Authors

  • Jamal Biganeh Center for Health Related Social and Behavioral Sciences Research, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran. orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2903-8200
  • Seyed Mohammad Mirrezaie Center for Health Related Social and Behavioral Sciences Research, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran. orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5352-4244
  • Mohammad Hossein Ebrahimi Environmental and Occupational Health Research Center, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22100/ijhs.v12i6.1661

Keywords:

Exposome , Advanced Trauma Life Support, Occupational Health

Abstract

Occupational health has traditionally focused on identifying and assessing individual hazards and examining their associations with specific health outcomes. This approach has generated valuable evidence for identifying and controlling occupational risks; however, it may not fully capture the complexity of workers’ exposure environments. Growing attention to occupational co-exposures has prompted a shift from assessing single agents to considering multiple exposures simultaneously1. This approach can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the factors affecting workers’ health and facilitate the investigation of cumulative or interactive effects of multiple exposures. Nevertheless, even assessments of multiple workplace exposures may not capture the full exposure context relevant to a worker’s health. Beyond the workplace, individuals encounter environmental, behavioral, and social factors that may affect health independently or through interactions with occupational exposures2. This broader perspective brings the exposome concept into focus. The exposome encompasses an individual’s non-genetic exposures throughout life and considers their relationships with biological responses and health over time3. In occupational health, the working-life exposome concept has also been introduced to capture a broader range of exposures and factors associated with working life, including the links between occupational and non-occupational exposures, and to move beyond narrowly defined “one exposure–one health outcome” frameworks4.

References

Niemeier RT, Williams PRD, Rossner A, Clougherty JE, Rice GE. A Cumulative Risk Perspective for Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Professionals. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(17):6342. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176342

Lentz TJ, Dotson GS, Williams PR, Maier A, Gadagbui B, Pandalai SP, et al. Aggregate Exposure and Cumulative Risk Assessment--Integrating Occupational and Non-occupational Risk Factors. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 2015;12 Suppl 1(sup1):S112-26. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1060326

Wild CP. Complementing the genome with an "exposome": the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention. 2005;14(8):1847-50. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0456

Pronk A, Loh M, Kuijpers E, Albin M, Selander J, Godderis L, et al. Applying the exposome concept to working life health: The EU EPHOR project. Environmental Epidemiology. 2022;6(2):e185. doi: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000185

Faisandier L, Bonneterre V, De Gaudemaris R, Bicout DJ. Occupational exposome: a network-based approach for characterizing Occupational Health Problems. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2011;44(4):545-552. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.02.010

Vineis P, Chadeau-Hyam M, Gmuender H, Gulliver J, Herceg Z, Kleinjans J, et al. The exposome in practice: Design of the EXPOsOMICS project. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2017;220(2 Pt A):142-151. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.08.001

Downloads

Published

2026-11-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Biganeh, J. ., Mirrezaie, S. M., & Ebrahimi, M. H. (2026). From the Complete Exposome to an Actionable Exposure Profile in Occupational Health. Shahroud Journal of Medical Sciences, 12(6), 80-82. https://doi.org/10.22100/ijhs.v12i6.1661