Efficacy of e-FAST in the Detection of Free Intraperitoneal Fluid Following Blunt Abdominal Trauma: A Cross-Sectional Study from Shahroud, Iran
Authors
- Gelareh Karimi Goudarzi Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
-
Hossein Amiri Largani
School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3303-873X
-
Maryam Abbaszadeh
Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Clinical Research Development Unit, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0450-855X
-
Seyed Meysam Yekesadat
Researcher, Clinical Research Development Unit, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1447-371X
-
Mohammad Bagher Sohrabi
General Practitioner, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6768-832X
-
Ali Abbasi
Assistant Professor of Nursing, Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0482-6208
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22100/ijhs.v12i2.1355Keywords:
Blunt abdominal trauma, e-FAST, Peritoneal fluid, Ultrasonography, CT scanAbstract
Background: Blunt abdominal trauma is among the most critical injuries in emergency medicine, often requiring rapid diagnosis to prevent morbidity and mortality. Although computed tomography (CT) scan with intravenous (IV) contrast remains the gold standard for detecting intraperitoneal free fluid, limitations such as cost and availability necessitate alternative tools like the extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (e-FAST). This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of e-FAST ultrasonography in identifying free intraperitoneal fluid among trauma patients.
Methods: In this cross-sectional analytical study, 110 patients with blunt abdominal trauma admitted to Imam Hossein Hospital in Shahroud during 2019 were evaluated. After clinical examination, all patients underwent e-FAST ultrasonography followed by abdominal CT with IV contrast scan as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of e-FAST were calculated and compared with CT findings.
Results: Of the 110 patients, 82 (74.5%) were male. The mean age was 39.15 ± 17.52 years, with the highest prevalence in the 36–50 age group. e-FAST findings showed a sensitivity of 76%, specificity of 82%, PPV of 74.5%, NPV of 79%, and overall diagnostic accuracy of 91% in detecting free intraperitoneal fluid compared to CT scan. The area under the ROC curve was 0.855, indicating excellent diagnostic performance.
Conclusion: The e-FAST ultrasonography demonstrates high accuracy and acceptable sensitivity and specificity for detecting free fluid in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Given its accessibility and low cost, e-FAST can be considered a reliable initial diagnostic tool, although CT scan remains necessary in equivocal or high-risk cases.
References
Brenkert TE, Adams C, Vieira RL, Rempell RG. Peritoneal fluid localization on FAST examination in the pediatric trauma patient. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(10):1497-1499. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.04.025
Lingawi SS, Buckley AR. Focused abdominal US in patients with trauma. Radiology. 2000;217(2):426-429. doi: 10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv23426
Brenchley J, Walker A, Sloan JP, Hassan TB, Venables H. Evaluation of focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) by UK emergency physicians. Emerg Med J. 2006;23(6):446-448. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.026864
Gracias VH, Frankel HL, Gupta R, et al. Defining the learning curve for the Focused Abdominal Sonogram for Trauma (FAST) examination: implications for credentialing. Am Surg. 2001;67(4):364-368. doi: 10.1177/000313480106700414
Sirlin CB, Casola G, Brown MA, et al. Quantification of fluid on screening ultrasonography for blunt abdominal trauma: a simple scoring system to predict severity of injury. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20(4):359-364. doi: 10.7863/jum.2001.20.4.359
Branney SW, Wolfe RE, Moore EE, et al. Quantitative sensitivity of ultrasound in detecting free intraperitoneal fluid. J Trauma. 1995;39(2):375-380. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199508000-00032
Kanafi AR, Giti M, Gharavi MH, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of secondary ultrasound exam in blunt abdominal trauma. Iran J Radiol. 2014;11(3):e21010. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.21010
O'Brien KM, Stolz LA, Amini R, et al. Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma Examination: Reexamining the Importance of the Left Upper Quadrant View. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34(8):1429-1434. doi: 10.7863/ultra.34.8.1429
Unlüer EE, Yavaşi O, Kara PH, et al. Paramedic-performed Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) in the emergency department. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2011;17(2):113-116. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2011.88557
Becker A, Lin G, McKenney MG, et al. Is the FAST exam reliable in severely injured patients? Injury. 2010;41(5):479-483. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.10.054
Sierzenski PR, Schofer JM, Bauman MJ, Nomura JT. The double-line sign: a false positive finding on the Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) examination. J Emerg Med. 2011;40(2):188-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.07.029
Bowra J, Forrest-Horder S, Caldwell E, et al. Validation of nurse-performed FAST ultrasound. Injury. 2010;41(5):484-487. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.08.009
Sutton D. Textbook of Radiology and Imaging. 7th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2003:691-692.
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Copyright Form should be downloaded and signed by corresponding author in the fourth step "upload supplementary files" during submission process.
After acceptance, copyright form should be downloaded and signed by all authors one by one ( "summery --> supp. file" part and click on "add a supplementary file" link).
